Last class, we discussed
traits of certain male characters in the Book of Esther. Namely, we noted some
of the emasculate qualities of both Haman and King Ahasuerus. For example,
after Mordechai refuses to bow down to Haman, Haman then takes measures to eradicate
all of the Jews. In my opinion, this reaction is sign of weakness, and almost
emasculates Haman. By taking Mordechai’s gesture so seriously, he—in turn—diminishes
his sense-of-self. Do you feel that Haman’s reaction displays power or
weakness?
-Ethan G
Haman seems to be a man honoring his job working under the King. He has power working alongside the king, but it is very limited because of his loyalty to him. I perceived Mordecai's action of not bowing down to Haman as a reference to Jews not obeying any other higher power besides their God or Yahweh. In the past, the King was the closest link to any god(s) or he was thought to be a god himself. Therefore, it could be possible to assume that Haman is supposed to be perceived as weak since he gives loyalty to a secular power.
ReplyDelete